Thanks for the thread, Voltron.

[img][/img]

I actually am like most people lol. I can see why you would think otherwise, though, or rather want such to be the case.

Most people would simply say, "thanks for the chat," especially when they know the other person doesn't like chatting to begin with lol

Law, true... but I am talking about talking, which is an issue that undermines any solution for FFA and Clerics lol

Well Since you cant Answer with a straight"no,i dont",i guess my assumption wasn't that uncalled for.you little wanker Doesn't really solve any problems to directly answer you, though, now does it? Unless you also consider one's own well-being to become better rather than others' to also be pleasur...

Healy wrote:Being entirely honest with oneself is a Good exercise-siegmund freud

Then When ur honest about it you may be able to Answer

You're the one equating logic to a fetish, not I.

Healy wrote:Ever heard of autoeroticism,the way you write makes me from a readers point of view think you really enjoyed yourself while you Typed it.

Because you can't fathom the alternative? Or because you aren't meant to?

Healy wrote:Slow down Cowboy i asked first

I'd have to value appearance and reason for such, would I not?

Healy wrote:Are u touching urself while u write These Posts Kura?

Does that mean you equate being logical to pleasure?

Also, not to be rude, because your heart is in the right place, but "sense" is different from "common sense." The first is a bias independent of external objective reality, and the second has the word "common," because it refers to what the average individual in a group would do; i.e., reasonable pe...

That really isn't balanced at all, though, nor is it logical, but, rather, it is the situation which you emotionally align with. In the situation you provided, the condition for which clerics are what you call balanced exists as an independent variable outside of there being equal cleric numbers bet...

So clerics being OP'd compared to other classes is what you consider to be balanced?

I'm comparing it more to white king vs black king. Cleric: ability to give life. Others: ability to take life. 1 on 1 they should cancel out when circumstances are equivocal. 2 clerics vs 2 other's should cancel out when circumstances are equivocal. It's removing from the board by removing the self ...

Well, Clerics are life and the other classes are death, so really, in neutral territory, each of the other 3 classes should be able to neutralize a cleric 1v1 to halt the cleric from healing his teammates. Like a big gay bear hug.