Page 3 of 4

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 8:40 pm, Wed Mar 22, 2017
by Kuraokami
That really isn't balanced at all, though, nor is it logical, but, rather, it is the situation which you emotionally align with.

In the situation you provided, the condition for which clerics are what you call balanced exists as an independent variable outside of there being equal cleric numbers between teams, i.e., a Zero Sum Game. Logically, if such was the case, Clerics could be modified in any shape or fashion and still be what you call balanced, so what is or is not actually balanced simply does not exist for clerics to you.

It is not in the realm of logic nor reason for you, but rather an entirely emotional judgement, which is perfectly fine, as everyone is entitled to have such simply by the virtue that we are all people. However, the words and terminology that you're using will lead to more confusion than not.

In example, during my tenure, I heard you speak of balancing spells, classes, pools, etc., as many did, but if ten people are speaking of balance, it doesn't matter who attempts to balance nor the effort they put into it, if the ten out of ten people are all actually referring to their emotional predispositions while calling it something else altogether. This actually happens a good deal on here, and is evident when groups of players call for one thing, but quickly fractionatw once the one thing is done, because the one thing was never really one thing to begin with. In your case, you're prone to promoting balance while actually seeking arbitrary imbalance in the game with purely community actions as the determinant factor for what you want.

Again, all this is fine, as to each his own, but communication tends to work better when people everyone is using the same words to represent the same things. Individuals using the word balance to mean imbalance and the words logic and reason to mean emotions, really only ends up disservicing everyone involved, most similar to a simple shouting match of incoherent noises.

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 8:46 pm, Wed Mar 22, 2017
by Kuraokami
Also, not to be rude, because your heart is in the right place, but "sense" is different from "common sense." The first is a bias independent of external objective reality, and the second has the word "common," because it refers to what the average individual in a group would do; i.e., reasonable person. Because such is group dependant, the "common sense" for MS players would be "troll matches when I am butthurt due to poor sportsmanship," which, of course is capable of changing over time. That said, such is not actual common sense of people in general, as actual common sense would say "don't waste your life on 22 year old video game," but I'm guilty of that as well lol

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 10:33 pm, Wed Mar 22, 2017
by Healy
Are u touching urself while u write These Posts Kura?

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 11:24 pm, Wed Mar 22, 2017
by Kuraokami
Healy wrote:Are u touching urself while u write These Posts Kura?
Does that mean you equate being logical to pleasure?

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 11:57 pm, Wed Mar 22, 2017
by Healy
Slow down Cowboy i asked first

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 12:11 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Kuraokami
Healy wrote:Slow down Cowboy i asked first
I'd have to value appearance and reason for such, would I not?

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 12:24 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Healy
Ever heard of autoeroticism,the way you write makes me from a readers point of view think you really enjoyed yourself while you Typed it.

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 12:26 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Kuraokami
Healy wrote:Ever heard of autoeroticism,the way you write makes me from a readers point of view think you really enjoyed yourself while you Typed it.
Because you can't fathom the alternative? Or because you aren't meant to?

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 12:39 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Healy
Being entirely honest with oneself is a Good exercise-siegmund freud

Then When ur honest about it you may be able to Answer

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 12:49 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Kuraokami
Healy wrote:Being entirely honest with oneself is a Good exercise-siegmund freud

Then When ur honest about it you may be able to Answer
You're the one equating logic to a fetish, not I.

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 12:57 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Healy
Well Since you cant Answer with a straight"no,i dont",i guess my assumption wasn't that uncalled for.you little wanker

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 1:08 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Law
Guys guys.. stick to the topic. We're talking about how Clerics are dogshi... I mean FFAs.

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 1:14 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Kuraokami
Healy wrote:Well Since you cant Answer with a straight"no,i dont",i guess my assumption wasn't that uncalled for.you little wanker
Doesn't really solve any problems to directly answer you, though, now does it? Unless you also consider one's own well-being to become better rather than others' to also be pleasurable.

In dialectics, the opposite of wanting to win a logical argument is the necessity to win a logical argument, and the opposite of for ones own self is for others. One can reach the same conclusion by separate meana. Your natural predisposition was to assume that I logically win an argument for my own benefit, whereas the reality is that I logically win arguments for the benefit of others. In this specific case, it was because I've witnessed a lot of turmoil about the concept of balance and arguing about which way makes the most sense, when in reality it's summed up to miscommunication due to terminology and not recognizing "because I like it that way" as a completely acceptable answer, free from any sort of rationalizing.

Interestingly enough, however, in personality theory there is a "Healer" personality type, which actually does have "appearing logical" as it's eroticism, so thank you for answering my question.

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 1:15 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Kuraokami
Law, true... but I am talking about talking, which is an issue that undermines any solution for FFA and Clerics lol

Re: Vote To Keep or Remove FFA matchtype

Posted: 1:20 am, Thu Mar 23, 2017
by Healy
Im actually just passing time at work and you can always count on Kura When u need a conversation about stuff that doesnt really matter.

Ok here is something ontopic.ffa is boring and clerics are OP .whats new?